RAID 10 vs. RAID 5 Performance

 

RAID 10 vs. RAID 5 Performance

One of my clients is in the process of standardizing all their servers on RAID 10.  We discovered one of their smaller servers had been delivered with RAID 5 already configured.  I took the opportunity to run some tests on the drives prior to reconfiguring them into RAID 10.  My tests weren't very scientific.  I just used SQLIO.EXE to generate random 8KB reads and writes.

 

image

 

Reads were just a little bit better but writes were almost twice as fast.  This makes sense as the array isn't spending time computing the parity information.  Some notes on my setup:

  • There are FOUR drives in the array.
  • Each drive was a 146GB 15K SAS drive with 8MB of cache.
  • The test was performed with a 5GB file.  I'd prefer a larger file but my time was limited and the RAID 5 tests were already completed.
  • The controller was one of the low-end PERC controllers from Dell.
  • 64KB random writes showed a similar doubling of IOPS.  I didn't test sequential writes.

Print | posted on Monday, June 18, 2007 10:45 AM

 

이 글은 스프링노트에서 작성되었습니다.

'SQL Server 2005' 카테고리의 다른 글

SQL 2000 master db 복구 방법이 뭐란 말인가 ㅠ.ㅠ  (0) 2008.04.01
SQL Disk 구성  (0) 2008.03.14
RAID 0, 1, 5, 0+1 의 이해  (0) 2008.03.14
RAID 0+1 VS RAID 10  (0) 2008.03.14
Query Tunning - 3월 12일 Study  (0) 2008.03.12